This week E, the student who terrorized the lesson I wrote about last week, was removed from my class. I asked the principal to come in at the beginning of the next lesson to reinstate the values of the classroom (You are all here to learn, no one can disrupt another student's right to learn, etc), and when she reached the end of her little motivational speech, the students seemed, for the most part, to agree with her. It was therefore surprising that when she asked if anyone felt he could not take on the responsibility of learning, E spoke up. "I do not accept what was stated here," he chirped.
One has to feel sorry for E. Last year, I have heard since becoming interested in his case, he was visibly depressed. He spoke constantly of suicide, when he spoke at all, and his lack of place in the world and the school. He was silent, thin and pale. Puberty, it seemed, had taken a rather wringing toll on him.
But what was depression last year has become elation since the beginning of this one. Life says white, E boldly, boisterously and persistently says black. He rebels against anyone older than age 17. His wits have turned him from class mute to class clown, and he is drunk with newfound power. Perhaps for this reason E has feelings of persecution, as he told the guidance counselor, (though she found these feelings to emanate solely from the two teachers who are new in his life - myself and his homeroom teacher). E has overshot his mark, it seems, and once again finds himself displaced, like an Amish man who has joined the party scene only to become an alcoholic.
I find myself distinctly penitent over the battle I allowed E to wage against me. Things may be very different now if I had just taken him aside that very first day, asked him to tell me what was wrong and why he felt I could not teach him. Now, granted, this dialogue might not have worked at all, or made me appear pathetic in his eyes, but at least I would have known I had exhausted all options. As it is, I am left with the knowledge that I beat a 14-year old boy in a battle of wits - not at all a proud achievement.
What is tricky about this age, I find, is that students appear to be adults - in speech, behavior, and often physical traits (some of my students are taller than me) - and this makes it exceedingly difficult to remember that, in their hearts and minds, they are little more than children. Engaging in battles of wit with them just a little less reprehensible than doing so with a 5-year old. Indeed, a middle school student walks a thin and perilous line between childhood and adulthood, and it is an educator's job to transport him safely, and with as little trauma as possible, along this ragged path. It is a trying and exhausting ordeal, but oh, how rewarding can it be!
I say this because today I visited my old school, the one that so ruthlessly divested me of any and all innocence and naivete I may have had last year. I was told that V, my shyest and quietest homeroom student, whom I probed and prodded and encouraged to speak all year, is now volunteering to speak in class. What's more, V, who had very few friends and whose name almost none of the students knew, made a video clip with two of the most popular boys in his grade for their first school project, which won the competition.
Without too much boasting or tooting of personal horns, I would like to give myself just a little credit for V's achievement. Of course it wasn't just me who caused this change, but I doubt it is very wrong to feel a little, tiny bit good about myself.
I began this year with a very harsh stance towards the students. Scared, perhaps, that they would not take me seriously. That they would walk all over me if given the chance. But this approach, too, exists on a very thin, membranous line between laxness and Machiavellian zeal. What I've realized, thanks to E, is that I'd much rather be a teacher who is taken advantage of than a teacher who traumatizes.